Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Schuerger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:56, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Schuerger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

vanity piece, no independent sources Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:26, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Michael Schürger has indeed produced and acted in films, but I can find no sources outside of film sites like IMDB. His latest film, Far Rockaway, does not appear in Variety. Since he is also a musician, perhaps someone can find sources relating to that genre. Also, I note that there is no entry in WP:DE, although I also know that WP:DE is rather strict about BLPs and especially those involved in popular culture. It is possible that WP:EN is therefore seen as a more amenable WP source. LaMona (talk) 23:13, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural delete for WP:OR in a BLP. Vrac (talk) 21:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Dear LoMona, what exactly do you mean by "no sources outside of film sites"? I'm really not certain, but I'm tempted to ask: Do you expect to find fish at the butcher's? Anyway, he is a link to a daily paper I fished out of google in a split second: http://www.rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/krefeld/schluff-film-in-new-yorker-kino-gezeigt-aid-1.3767428 Budybla23 (talk) 22:07, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"... film sites like IMDB..." - IMDB is a site listing films, that anyone can edit. Therefore it is considered not a reliable source. There are other such sites, from Rotten Tomatoes to the "mashable" film section. So perhaps a clearer description would have been "social sites that list films and let anyone make changes." Does that explain it to you? LaMona (talk) 21:20, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, not anyone but only the producers are allowed to make entries in IMDB, and they get carefully checked before published.Budybla23 (talk) 10:21, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. His most significant credit appears to be being a "segment director" of The Fallen (2004). Far from enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:04, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Michael Schuerger

zproxy.org